Thirties Reductionism said that once scientists knew the behavior of one of the Protons that made up Winston Churchill's body (and multiplied it by a trillion trillion trillion identical protons), they could then predict Churchill's behavior over the 1936 Abdication Crisis.
Thirties Reification said that Human Progress is real and concrete and since it was so clearly evident that Human Progress 'wants to get ever bigger and bigger',then dividing Human Progress up into the two billion individual people that existed in the world in 1939, would allow us to predict that particular individual Scott Nearing would also approve of things getting ever bigger.
But in fact he became famous for disagreeing bigger is better.
Showing posts with label winston churchill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label winston churchill. Show all posts
Saturday, June 8, 2013
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Needed: a political - not Technological/Whig - history of wartime penicillin
Almost all histories of penicillin have but one plot : the dramatic, last minute come-from-behind victory of the little guy, HIGH TECH MAN, over the vast evil forces of Nature and fungi spores.
In pointed fact, the technical problems of producing life-saving penicillin was solved very quickly, basically done by one or two individuals with remarkably low level technology, by the Fall of 1941.
But even the most affluent members of the world could not reliably access life-saving penicillin for another five years and it still remains important to discover why.
In pointed fact, the technical problems of producing life-saving penicillin was solved very quickly, basically done by one or two individuals with remarkably low level technology, by the Fall of 1941.
But even the most affluent members of the world could not reliably access life-saving penicillin for another five years and it still remains important to discover why.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
"Pax Penicillia" : how Churchill's Britain won the war and lost the peace
The decision by Winston Churchill's (Tory) Minister of Supply (MoS) not to divert the money for one additional Lancaster squadron, used to bomb civilians in Europe, towards providing enough penicillin for British (and European) civilians resulted in Churchill's Tories winning the war for Britain --- but at the cost of losing the peace.
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Penicillin's "Bengali Famine Years" : 1943-1944
It was not America and Britain, it was not even the British and American governments ,that made the momentous decision, between late 1942 and early 1943, not to divert tax money just a little away from bombs and towards penicillin production instead.
This decision led, over the period of 1943-1944, to a Bengali Famine-like situation among the Allies over shortages of live-saving drugs for civilians.
This decision led, over the period of 1943-1944, to a Bengali Famine-like situation among the Allies over shortages of live-saving drugs for civilians.
Labels:
andrew duncan,
bengali famine,
FDR,
gandhi,
glaxo,
harry jephcott,
howard florey,
ministry of supply,
osrd,
penicillin,
raymond rettew,
tory party,
vannevar bush,
winston churchill,
wpb
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
The first - and internally fatal - Tory response to the Beveridge Report : the Ministry of Supply takes over Penicillin ...
To make sense of this claim, we need to clear as to what the role of Britain's powerful wartime Ministry of Supply actually was.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Patient ONE of the Antibiotics Era : how the saving of Charlie Aronson changed our world
During his lifetime, Dr Henry Dawson only gave penicillin to several dozen endocarditis patients, Charlie Aronson first among them ; only saved several dozen lives, Charlie among them.
Dawson's pioneering effort to inject Charlie with penicillin on October 16th and 17th 1940 (Dies Miribilis) certainly didn't directly save many lives.
But the moral fact that Dawson cared enough in the first place about Charlie-the-person, to pioneer in making and to giving him penicillin, has certainly saved tens and tens of millions of lives ever since Dawson's premature death in 1945.
If only the greater cultural milieu surrounding Dawson and Charlie had been as willing - nay as eager - to save Charlie 'the 4F of the 4Fs' as Dawson was, it might also have been as willing - nay eager - to save the Jews of Europe as well.
Dawson's pioneering effort to inject Charlie with penicillin on October 16th and 17th 1940 (Dies Miribilis) certainly didn't directly save many lives.
But the moral fact that Dawson cared enough in the first place about Charlie-the-person, to pioneer in making and to giving him penicillin, has certainly saved tens and tens of millions of lives ever since Dawson's premature death in 1945.
If only the greater cultural milieu surrounding Dawson and Charlie had been as willing - nay as eager - to save Charlie 'the 4F of the 4Fs' as Dawson was, it might also have been as willing - nay eager - to save the Jews of Europe as well.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Nova Scotia-born Dr Henry Dawson and the wartime re-invention of a military secret weapon into a widely publicized beacon of hope
I am talking about penicillin of course.
What other artifact of war has so abruptly and so totally changed its character over the course of a war ?
What other artifact of war has so abruptly and so totally changed its character over the course of a war ?
Thursday, December 27, 2012
America sure loves its minutemen and riflemen - except during wartime
![]() |
| MOS 745 (circa 1780) |
Do you think that wartime penicillin should just be for healthy young scallywags who cheat on their wives but are still fully combat-ready or do you think it should be "wasted" on the dying of all nations, races and creeds ?
Some things never change and the skygods and earthlings still mix it up to oppose each other as much today on gun control and climate change as they did back almost 75 years ago on the best uses for wartime penicillin.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Politics as the authoritative "prioritizing" of values
![]() |
| A Canadian (but not Canada) morally defines wartime penicillin |
That consensus says that "prices" are used to come to an informal economic agreement as to the allocating of scarce resources between alternative uses.
But politics authoritatively allocates (rations/triages) scarce resources between alternative uses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

